Appointment against the post of Sub-Inspector Police—Medical re-examination—Scope—Petitioner was declared medically fit and Public Service Commission recommended for his appointment—Department instead of complying with the recommendation of Public Service Commission passed a fresh order for medical re-examination of petitioner on the ground that he was deficient in height—Plea of petitioner was that once height test was cleared before the Selection Board then same could not be re-determined—Validity—Candidate got his height measured from Medical Superintendent DHQ Hospital wherein it was determined as five feet and seven inches—Application of petitioner was processed by the concerned authorities including Public Service Commission which recommended the appointment of candidate on merits—Terms and conditions for appointment contained in the advertisement did not mention that after selection process candidates could be medically re-examined—When petitioner’s height was initially measured it was found to be corresponding with the requirement i.e. 5 feet and 7 inches—Candidate was not put to notice that his height would be re-measured—Authorities had no case to reject the appointment of petitioner on the basis of height—No illegality, mala fide or any other discrepancy had been pointed out in the report filed by Medical Superintendent DHQ Hospital—Measurement process could be defective in either of the stages and benefit, if any, would go to the person who was to be effected thereby—Once petitioner was found to have complied with the requirement of height in one measurement process then second measurement declaring him not complying with the height requirement was not justified—Second measurement was declared to be without lawful authority—Authorities were directed to proceed with the case of candidate by treating his height equal to five feet and seven inches as initially determined by the Medical Board—Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly. [Paras. 8, 9, 10 & 11 of the judgment]